The Thrifty Streamer Take
What this means for your streaming budgetThe fact that Alan Ritchson chose not to pursue a reckless endangerment charge against Taylor raises questions about the value we place on these types of shows. If even a prominent star can decide not to press charges, how much do you think the producers of "Reacher" actually care about its success? This could be an opportunity for us to reassess our streaming budgets and consider alternatives that might offer more bang for our buck. For instance, have you considered rotating your subscriptions between different services or opting for ad-supported versions of popular shows?
One possible take-away from this situation is the "bundle effect". If a show's star is willing to forgo charges against someone who incited the altercation, what does that say about the value we place on that show? Is it really worth paying full price for "Reacher" when we can get similar content at a lower cost elsewhere? For example, if you're currently paying $10/month for an ad-supported version of "Reacher", consider switching to a free or low-cost alternative and putting that money towards other streaming services. You might be surprised at how much of a difference it makes in the long run!
Read the Full Article
This story was originally published on The Hollywood Reporter.
Read Full Story on